I agree with Aaron, it's not the job of a standard to figure out those things, but to provide us with the expected public behavior and interface. The rest should be implementation interface.
Pavel On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Brian Mastenbrook <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: > >> My assertion is that mapping a module language to a specific system >> behavior such as how the modules are laid out in the file system is >> a bad >> idea. > > > Where should this mapping be spelled out? Is it up to every > implementation to figure out, or can the mapping be nailed down for > implementations on a certain set of known platforms? > -- > Brian Mastenbrook > [email protected] > http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > r6rs-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss > _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
