On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:21:59 -0400, Brian Mastenbrook
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
>
>> My assertion is that mapping a module language to a specific system
>> behavior such as how the modules are laid out in the file system is a
>> bad
>> idea.
>
>
> Where should this mapping be spelled out? Is it up to every
> implementation to figure out, or can the mapping be nailed down for
> implementations on a certain set of known platforms?
I think it would make sense to have a working group for standardizing
behavior or locations or something like this, but it would be a standard
that is optional. We could have this standard for POSIX, or some other
platform, say.
Aaron W. Hsu
--
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
