On Sep 14, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:21:59 -0400, Brian Mastenbrook > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sep 10, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: >> >>> My assertion is that mapping a module language to a specific system >>> behavior such as how the modules are laid out in the file system >>> is a >>> bad >>> idea. >> >> >> Where should this mapping be spelled out? Is it up to every >> implementation to figure out, or can the mapping be nailed down for >> implementations on a certain set of known platforms? > > I think it would make sense to have a working group for standardizing > behavior or locations or something like this, but it would be a > standard > that is optional. We could have this standard for POSIX, or some other > platform, say.
I believe there's a SRFI addressing this issue. It was already submitted and is awaiting the editors to push it out as a draft. Aziz,,, _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
