Brian Mastenbrook scripsit: > Evaluating arbitrary Scheme at expansion time brings several issues into > play that would not exist otherwise: phasing semantics, the interaction > between phases and binding visibility, and the necessity of having an > interpreter in an otherwise cross-compiler-only implementation.
*Exactly* why I don't want it in Thing One. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <[email protected]> You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5) _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
