> In my mind, the primary benefit of `syntax-case' is that it encourages > implementations to get the details of hygiene correct. Of the > implementations that I've tested, Scheme48 is the only non-syntax-case > implementation which does so. (If anyone is aware of other non-syntax-case > implementations with correct implementations of hygiene, I'd love to hear > about it.) [...]
MIT Scheme supports syntax-rules, syntactic closures, and an explicit renaming system, all of which are hygienic macro systems. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
