John Cowan wrote: > David Van Horn scripsit: >> I have made the same suggestion on this mailing list. (Although I don't >> buy the bit about the need for an interpreter [at compile time]). > > Well, let us say then, some means of evaluating arbitrary Scheme at > compile time. It can compile the bodies of low-level macros, load them > into itself, and invoke them.
I still don't buy it, but I don't think this is a conversation that is useful to hash out. Sorry. David _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
