John Cowan wrote: > Brian Mastenbrook scripsit: > >> Evaluating arbitrary Scheme at expansion time brings several issues into >> play that would not exist otherwise: phasing semantics, the interaction >> between phases and binding visibility, and the necessity of having an >> interpreter in an otherwise cross-compiler-only implementation. > > *Exactly* why I don't want it in Thing One.
I have made the same suggestion on this mailing list. (Although I don't buy the bit about the need for an interpreter). David _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
