> Are you all trying to give hope to the top level? I see you have "math" in your return address, so I take it you understand the idea of proof by contradiction. So let's see...
1. Lisp has had 50 years of vibrant innovation, highly productive programmers, great advances in everything from practical storage allocation strategies to theoretical computer science, all with a top level repl. 2. The world view of Matthew Flatt and/or PLT and/or hygienic macros implies that the top level is hopeless. What can we conclude from these observations? _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
