> And R6RS has mandated the latter semantics, which makes conforming > REPLs all but impossible.
AIUI, this is the central reason why everybody hates R6. It has other problems, but they're fixable. Am I confused? (And yes, I realize that "everybody" is hyperbole.) > Meanwhile, syntax-rules macros are sufficiently restricted as to avoid > the issue. I know this is asking a lot, but would someone more experienced in macrology than I write a syntax-rules version of http://inst/~cs61a/fa09/library/obj.scm which is documented in http://inst/~cs61a/reader/aboveline.pdf http://inst/~cs61a/reader/ref-man.pdf http://inst/~cs61a/reader/belowline.pdf If this is doable, I can live with just syntax-rules, I guess. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
