> site:http://www.cs.brown.edu/pipermail/plt-scheme "The top level is hopeless"
Okay, I read the links. I stand by my proof by contradiction. What these messages point out is that two things are inconsistent: 1. Lisp's 50-year-old, wildly-successful, intuitive, powerful, productive, easy-to-specify interactive repl; 2. PLT's weird, incomprehensible, unprecedented, unproven, bizarre notion of what top-level definition should mean. Okay, you've convinced me: one of these has to go. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
