>> How far do you want to go with the "efficiency hack" thing? All the >> way back to lambda calculus and Peano arithmetic? Or maybe just dump >> strings in favor of vectors? Good heavens--vectors? Lists are all we >> need! :-) > > Now it's you who are singing the Beatles.
I have to assume you're kidding. I was responding to a comment about "efficiency hacks", and I was pointing out that many things we take for granted in Scheme could be considered "efficiency hacks". Again, I'm arguing for raising the abstraction bar, not lowering it. That really seems to be the polar opposite of "All You Need Is Lambda". _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
