>I'm going to say straight up that WG1, pedagogical language, and >WG1, embedded-systems language, have conflicting needs that will be >at best difficult to reconcile in a single standard.
+1 I'm wondering whether WG1-P will even need to be WG2-compatible. OTOH, we want to be sure that implementors will implement it! _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
