> Now, I do see your argument for giving Scheme just a very low-level > data storage abstraction and letting things be built on top of it - > but that's an implementation technique, not a specification issue.
Something like define-vector-type allows a Scheme implementation to do no worse than it would otherwise (ie, simply use a general vector) but potentially much better. That seems to be as much of an implementation technique as, say, fixnums vs bignums. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
