At Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:58:44 -0700, Alexis King wrote:
> I’ve actually taken some small stabs at implementing something like
> this, 

Great!

> but it’s a nontrivial project

That's almost certainly true.


> especially since the current
> package server’s API seems to be undocumented (I’m referring to the
> API the JS uses, not the interface raco uses)

I can't comment much on that, except to say that the package server is
kind of its own thing by design, and so that part is likely more fluid
and easier to change as you see fit.


> Plus I’d be on my own,

NO!

Take a bigger stab. Post code. Submit pull requests.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/20150902000420.538316501A3%40mail-svr1.cs.utah.edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to