Rather than splitting "core packages" from "community packages", what if we used the package ring system? [1] We could establish a way for the Racket community to bless packages with "ring zero" status, then provide a --catalog argument to Scribble to lookup ring information in when deciding how to style package documentation. The docs would remain unified, we'd have a centralized place to curate packages, and there's no artificial barrier that prevents user-contributed packages from living alongside main-distribution packages.
[1] http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/Future_Plans.html?q=ring -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
