On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Lincoln Stoll <lst...@lstoll.net> wrote:
> I guess less time in dev, consistency in testing and language for > development, potentially more efficient output, integration with existing > code? > I'm not using it at the moment, but in some ways it looks interesting. > Seems reasonable. As long the js is debuggable. Having to learn js (and more importantly, the GWT style of 'compiled' js) because the abstraction leaked would be my main concern as a java developer. You can't use sass without already knowing css, but if you can write GWT without knowing javascript then you may be running the risk of digging a very deep hole. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to rails-oceania@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rails-oceania+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
