Speaking from ignorance, as I've not used UFRaw. But it at least seems plausible that some image subjects, or perhaps camera-specific image types, would benefit from different demosaic settings than others.
To quote Einstein: one should make things as simple as possible, but no simpler. :-) Thanks for your great work on RawStudio. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Egger Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 3:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Rawstudio-dev] Trying RawStudio > I'm not so sure what to do about demosaic at all. I don't like all the > toggles and options of UFRaw, I like sliders and sane defaults. > > I want as few options as possible. Users shouldn't fiddle with toggles > and dials, Rawstudio should just magically work. I completely agree on this - users should get the best possible image quality in the shortest time possible. So there is probably no good reason to offer several different demosaic methods as ufraw does. But I noticed that color smoothing did in fact give me a better quality (at least for some of the samples I used). So, may be, it might be a good idea to do some extended tests and then just add color smoothing by default. Martin _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
