Ey, On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:51 +0200, Anders Kvist wrote: > I have been asked why I made the rawstudio-daily package for Ubuntu (our > PPA at Launchpad) the way I did. Well, the short answer were that I > wanted to allow a user to have both the regular Rawstudio package and > the daily package installed (as you cannot base your work on the daily > being usable all the time - new code that breaks something temporary and > errors). This has been more or less a hell to maintain, so I'm in for a > change if people want it? > > My suggestion is to build the rawstudio-daily package just the way we > would make the regular package...
Can't we have it both ways? Build as regular release but name the package rawstudio-daily and conflict with rawstudio? /Brander _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
