On 2010-10-14 23:02, Anders Brander wrote: > Ey, > > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 20:51 +0200, Anders Kvist wrote: > >> I have been asked why I made the rawstudio-daily package for Ubuntu (our >> PPA at Launchpad) the way I did. Well, the short answer were that I >> wanted to allow a user to have both the regular Rawstudio package and >> the daily package installed (as you cannot base your work on the daily >> being usable all the time - new code that breaks something temporary and >> errors). This has been more or less a hell to maintain, so I'm in for a >> change if people want it? >> >> My suggestion is to build the rawstudio-daily package just the way we >> would make the regular package... >> > Can't we have it both ways? > > Build as regular release but name the package rawstudio-daily and > conflict with rawstudio? > Ah, yes of cause! Then no problems... II'll give it a couple of days to simmer...
/Anders _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
