Bonjour stabilize a release every six months. the important thing is that files attached (xml?) to the raw images are readable after treatment for each version
(google translation) Philippe Delétrée 13 rue DOUDIN 59000 LILLE Portable: 06 62 58 38 01 Fixe FREEBOX: 09 52 75 38 29 2010/10/14 Anders Kvist <[email protected]> > Hey > > I have been asked why I made the rawstudio-daily package for Ubuntu (our > PPA at Launchpad) the way I did. Well, the short answer were that I > wanted to allow a user to have both the regular Rawstudio package and > the daily package installed (as you cannot base your work on the daily > being usable all the time - new code that breaks something temporary and > errors). This has been more or less a hell to maintain, so I'm in for a > change if people want it? > > My suggestion is to build the rawstudio-daily package just the way we > would make the regular package... > > I don't know how to handle versioning of the package when it's the same > package name. Currently we have these two ways: > > Version: 3521+273-0ubuntu1~lucid0 (An older of our own Launchpad packages) > Version: 1.2-5 (Ubuntu 10.04 package) > > My guess would be that a user won't be able to install a stable release > after having a daily package installed (unless they remove it or force > downgrade or something)...any comments on all this? > > /Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Rawstudio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
