I would add that I haven't bought any motherboard for any box that I assembled for my own use without using a Genuine Intel. Also, for each mainboard, check Intel's site for certified memory chips for that particular board.
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 4:41:00 PM UTC-4 rbytes wrote: > If you go 34in, think of concave display (Samsung?) so line-of-sight > distance and angle of incidence remain the same for any focal point across > the breadth of the display. Be sure you can set a dimmed brightness value > as your default, or get some serious Clark Kents. Throw a party for us all, > so's we can envy you. > > Bruce > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: javier....@vtgonline.com > To: rba...@googlegroups.com > Sent: 9/30/2020 1:30:11 PM > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Screen size and other tidbits. > > What screen resolution do you design your forms for? Most of my forms are > still designed to fit inside a 1024x768 display since a lot of users had > their OS and CPUs upgraded but are still stuck with old monitors. Our new > screens will be designed for the now standard 1920x1080 which seems to be > the current standard. > > Next question, I currently use two 23” 1920x1080 monitors side by side and > by and large works reasonably well. I am now considering moving to one > ultra-wide monitor (34”???). Seems like there is less stress on the video > driving one ultra-wide than two standard resolution monitors unless you get > a 4K monitor. I understand it is very subjective and also depends on desk > space real estate but any thought on the subject would be appreciated. > > Last, I am looking at new laptop. I have had an Intel Core 7 laptop > (with an upgraded SSD) and fortunately I bought the fastest processor > available at the time and has served me very well for many years and still > does. At one time, there were compatibility issues with AMD processors and > being an old timer it still registers although I know that is no longer an > issue. Some colleagues tell me the AMD Ryzen processor series is faster and > cheaper than the comparable Intel. Any experience with either? I know you > can’t go wrong with Intel but maybe the new generation of AMD processors > are indeed the better choice. > > > > Javier, > > > > Javier Valencia, PE > > javier....@vtgonline.com > > O: 913-829-0888 <(913)%20829-0888> > > C: 913-915-3137 <(913)%20915-3137> > > > > -- > For group guidelines, visit > http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBASE-L" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rbase-l+u...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAO1ueGVb5zRMiwo7hebUe7jCgAAAEAAAAHaDFYjnUmVItdyb%2BwwCAS0BAAAAAA%3D%3D%40vtgonline.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAO1ueGVb5zRMiwo7hebUe7jCgAAAEAAAAHaDFYjnUmVItdyb%2BwwCAS0BAAAAAA%3D%3D%40vtgonline.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- For group guidelines, visit http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBASE-L" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbase-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/4d372f66-54f3-4270-bd58-a14b05fa0704n%40googlegroups.com.