I would add that I haven't bought any motherboard for any box that I 
assembled for my own use without using a Genuine Intel.  Also, for each 
mainboard, check Intel's site for certified memory chips for that 
particular board.  


On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 4:41:00 PM UTC-4 rbytes wrote:

> If you go 34in, think of concave display (Samsung?) so line-of-sight 
> distance and angle of incidence remain the same for any focal point across 
> the breadth of the display. Be sure you can set a dimmed brightness value 
> as your default, or get some serious Clark Kents. Throw a party for us all, 
> so's we can envy you.
>
> Bruce
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: javier....@vtgonline.com
> To: rba...@googlegroups.com
> Sent: 9/30/2020 1:30:11 PM
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Screen size and other tidbits.
>
> What screen resolution do you design your forms for? Most of my forms are 
> still designed to fit inside a 1024x768 display since a lot of users had 
> their OS and CPUs upgraded but are still stuck with old monitors. Our new 
> screens will be designed for the now standard 1920x1080 which seems to be 
> the current standard.
>
> Next question, I currently use two 23” 1920x1080 monitors side by side and 
> by and large works reasonably well. I am now considering moving to one 
> ultra-wide monitor (34”???). Seems like there is less stress on the video 
> driving one ultra-wide than two standard resolution monitors unless you get 
> a 4K monitor. I understand it is very subjective and also depends on desk 
> space real estate but any thought on the subject would be appreciated.
>
> Last, I am  looking at new laptop. I have had  an Intel Core 7 laptop 
> (with an upgraded SSD) and fortunately I bought the fastest processor 
> available at the time and has served me very well for many years and still 
> does. At one time, there were compatibility issues with AMD processors and 
> being an old timer it still registers although I know that is no longer an 
> issue. Some colleagues tell me the AMD Ryzen processor series is faster and 
> cheaper than the comparable Intel. Any experience with either? I know you 
> can’t go wrong with Intel but maybe the new generation of AMD processors 
> are indeed the better choice.
>
>  
>
> Javier,
>
>  
>
> Javier Valencia, PE
>
> javier....@vtgonline.com
>
> O: 913-829-0888 <(913)%20829-0888>
>
> C: 913-915-3137 <(913)%20915-3137>
>
>  
>
> -- 
> For group guidelines, visit 
> http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBASE-L" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to rbase-l+u...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAO1ueGVb5zRMiwo7hebUe7jCgAAAEAAAAHaDFYjnUmVItdyb%2BwwCAS0BAAAAAA%3D%3D%40vtgonline.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAO1ueGVb5zRMiwo7hebUe7jCgAAAEAAAAHaDFYjnUmVItdyb%2BwwCAS0BAAAAAA%3D%3D%40vtgonline.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
For group guidelines, visit 
http://www.rbase.com/support/usersgroup_guidelines.php
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"RBASE-L" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbase-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbase-l/4d372f66-54f3-4270-bd58-a14b05fa0704n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to