no food can wreak havoc on any person's health. Only the person can do that by the choices they make. Fad diets count among bad choices - rank them up there with Jacqueline Suzanne novels, because that is where they belong - they are the fast food of the publishing industry.
On Friday, November 7, 2014 8:09:30 AM UTC-6, Deacon Patrick wrote: > > The grain of today is not the grain of Jesus or Joseph. It has been > selectively bread to withstand bugs and blights and climates, which means > more grows for the same effort, at the price of anti-nutrients that can > wreak havoc on health. It is also interesting to note that based on fossil > record dental caries came about with the rise of agriculture and did not > exist before. > > At least for me, grain is a "fall back food" -- if my choice is eat it or > starve, grain is indeed the bread of life. > > With abandon, > Patrick > > On Friday, November 7, 2014 7:01:20 AM UTC-7, Ron Mc wrote: >> >> now wait a minute here - grain is not sin - Joseph saved civilization by >> tithing the world's grain supply. Grain is not evil - it is the foundation >> of all civilization. Not picking on Grant here, but at some point it's the >> people writing books who are duping the public more than the triglyceride >> factories. I was fat, now I'm not, you should be like me. No, I'm not >> like you, I've always been active and healthy. My grandfather was a grain >> and pig farmer and he lived to 96. My grandmother made biscuits and >> cornbread at every meal (the dogs got the breakfast cornbread, and they >> lived healthy lives, too). >> >> On Friday, November 7, 2014 6:40:04 AM UTC-6, Steve Palincsar wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/2014 08:49 PM, justin...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> THERE IS ONE GROK. KNEEL BEFORE GROK! >>> >>> I guess squat before Grok would make more sense. >>> >>> >>> "Sense" has been conspicuous by its absence around here for a long, long >>> time. >>> >>> Are you now arguing for paleo monotheism? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyways. >>> >>> -J >>> >>> On Thursday, November 6, 2014 2:13:32 PM UTC-8, Steve Palincsar wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/2014 05:02 PM, Deacon Patrick wrote: >>>> >>>> There is simply too much we do not know to say the paleo lifespan was >>>> (pick your number). >>>> >>>> >>>> There never was any such thing as "*the* paleo life" any more than >>>> there was a single "paleo" diet. There were many different paleolithic >>>> life styles and many different diets. >>>> >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
