So I have a 54 hunq and my fiancé got the 46 Clem prototype. I can't reeaaallly speak to ride because I don't fit the 46. But here are my observations. Weight-similar Stoutness-similar Ride- hunq is potentially more aggressive. Could be a roadish bike with the right cockpit and wheels...though there are better options for that...but it has that capability. Feels faster. The Clem is a much more laid back, cruiserish, town bike. Upright is way upright. Stays are extra long. I think it could handle anything, but it wont be quick doing those things. Clearances- easier on the Clem, but similar
We love both of these bikes dearly. The hunqapillar was bought before the Clem's existed, but For me, having a us made, fully lugged frame was somewhat important. I prefer the geometry of the hunq coupled with the toughness. I don't feel slow on it. I'm not quite ready to go full heavy upright long chainstay crazy big tired out yet. For the fiancé, she doesn't care about road bikes, geometry, clearances etc. she wants a bike that can do what mine does, that she will be comfortable on, will last, looks good, and doesn't cost, to her, an obscene amount of money. Not to imply that caring about those things precludes you from wanting a Clem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
