Is this a typo? Because I thought it was supposed to be 54-55mm, which means 2.1ish.
Also, I remember reading these actually measured out to be 50mm on their prototype. I wonder if they resolved that, but I don't know anything about the tire molding process and how easy/difficult it is to change specs. On Friday, August 28, 2015 at 10:49:26 AM UTC-4, Ginz wrote: > > I'm a bit surprised at the 2.3" width. There are a lot of touring bikes > that can fit a 1.75 or 2.0...but 2.3 is really out there. In the 559 wheel > size, we're talking mountain bike. > > > > >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
