I’ve found that real Shimano SPDs work better than the various copies.
Wellgo , etc seem to have a clunkier entry and release. I started with
Shimano, then spent a lot of time on Time ATACs, but now I’ve been back on
SPDs for several years.  Relative to the Times, SPDs have less float on
paper, but it’s almost free float. Time’s float is always pushing against
the spring tension, so it never felt like much to me.

I use the entry level mtb 520s.  They work great, I still have my original
pair from the mid 90s.

Eric

On Thursday, February 23, 2023, Peter Adler <divisi....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greg's got the right idea: Start your clipless experiments with SPD,
> because they're ubiquitous and cheap to get.
>
> But the fact that they're easy to acquire doesn't mean they work for
> everybody. When I fearfully entered the clipless world circa 2010, I
> started with a pair of Wellgo pedals that had SPD on one side, and platform
> on the other. Although I tried for a couple of months, I could never get
> SPDs to work for me; I couldn't get the cleat to snap into the mechanism
> reliably, and I didn't get any noticeable feedback when I was successful.
> So I alternated between repeated failures to snap in/thinking I'd
> successfully snapped in, only to find my foot flying free off the
> pedal/thinking I'd failed, only to find that my foot was unexpectedly
> attached to the pedal. This gave me much *agita*.
>
> I then tried Crank Brothers pedals, and they were in my sweet spot. I've
> been riding CBs (Candys, the long-discontinued Quatros; if anybody's got
> Quatros to sell, hit me up) on my daily rider/pack mule (Raleigh
> International>Trek 720 touring) ever since. I find them easy to
> engage/disengage, and I feel a definitive SNAP when the cleat locks into
> the pedal, I also like having a little float, which CB provides. Plus, you
> can snap into Crank Brothers from either side, since the mechanism engages
> on all four of its faces. I have found that I can snap the spring holding
> the bits of the engagement mechanism in place, so I've got a couple of dead
> Quatros lying around. I haven't figured out how to disassemble the pedal so
> it's rebuildable; if I could do that, I could cannibalize the spring out of
> one pedal to rehab another.
>
> My advice is to start with SPD, for Greg's reasons. If they don't work,
> there are a lot of other options, each of which looks/feels different.
> Figure out what it was that didn't work for you on the SPDs, and let that
> guide you to one of the other candidates (CB, Time, Speedplay etc.). If
> none of your available clipless options work for you, platforms are fine -
> with or without toeclips/straps.
>
> Practice on a lawn; you'll fall down a lot at first. Most clipless newbies
> are nervous about disengaging at speed, but that almost never happens.
> You're most likely to fall over when you're going slow, or when you're
> stopping, especially of you have to stop suddenly and your instinct to
> disengage doesn't kick in fast enough to get a foot down. The half-dozen or
> so times I've fallen while cleated in have all been at red lights that had
> just turned as I approached. Since I was going slow when I fell, I mostly
> felt embarrassed, clumsy and stupid, rather than panicked. Passersby asked
> if I was OK, but I wasn't; I'd just bike-doofused in front of witnesses 😬
>
> Peter "pride goeth right when you fall down" Adler
> Berkeley, CA/USA
>
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 8:50:51 PM UTC-8 Greg J wrote:
> SPDs are ubiquitous, and you can find them for nearly free (for example, I
> have a couple of old but functional sets that I can send at cost, but I
> have no spare cleats).  If you like them generally, but find that they are
> lacking in some respect, then you can try the variations on the theme
> (eggbeaters, speedplay, road pedals, time, etc.), which all try to address
> some aspect of the clipless systems (float, platform size, weight, release
> mechanism, etc.).  Or if you decide that they're not worth the hype, then
> there you go.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6d29b838-06e9-4632-a46a-
> 589fb3f7e33en%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6d29b838-06e9-4632-a46a-589fb3f7e33en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CAHFNW5BT4qA%2Bq26d9c3xE%3D7kMFkRJzv%3DbiKyOpex1HnMgck-iw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to