I mistook the Rex figure for the carbon bike figure. 17 lb is more to be expected.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:54 PM, eflayer <eddie.fla...@att.net> wrote: > the all carbon bike weighs 17.0 lbs. > > On Mar 17, 8:38 pm, PATRICK MOORE <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree; a significantly lighter bike (and don't ask me to define > > "significantly" -- I know it when I ride it) has virtues of its own and, > > therefore, its own kind of fun -- light wheels especially, when you > climb. > > Of course, there are other bicycle qualities beside light weight (and > that > > may even trump light weight in a give instance) but ceteris paribus, > light > > has its own fun. > > > > Eddie: I'm surprised you got down only to 21 1/2 with all that carbon > fiber > > and those very light wheels on what looks to be a medium size frame. My > 58 > > cm Riv #3, back when it was a multispeed gofast, with its 7 lb frame and > > fork and headset, weighed 18 3/4 lb with a 1X10 drivetrain and titanium > only > > in the Flite rails and Specialized Aero stem binder bolt. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:31 PM, eflayer <eddie.fla...@att.net> wrote: > > > i own an all steel Gunnar Sport, a coupled Rambouillet, a custom Rex > > > with all carbon fork. poundage on those goes from a low of about 21.5 > > > up to 24. > > > > > for fun, i just built up a carbon Fisher Cronus; all carbon. for the > > > first time i paid attention to lower weight parts; carbon bars, carbon > > > seatpost, and shimano RS 80 1600 gram wheels. with pedals and cages it > > > weighs 17 lbs. that is nearly 5 less than the rest. i am old, sorta > > > plumpish, but i ride quite a bit. i can't quantify the difference, but > > > the lighter bike is a fine fun contrast to the others. you can drink > > > less beer, lose some weight...and until you actually do it, a > > > significantly lighter bike is a ball. > > > > > not my normal conservative approach. in fact, way out there: > > > > >https://picasaweb.google.com/107231724174916923201/CronusWheels# > > > > > On Mar 17, 8:16 pm, PATRICK MOORE <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Oh good, another controversy to jump into. Herewith: > > > > > > 1. I imagine that "heavy" is said relative to rider weight, no? If a > 17 > > > lb > > > > bike is light for me, it would be simply fragile for a 250 pounder. > > > > > > 2. Ditto for the bikes purpose: a fixie gofast has a different > standard > > > than > > > > a touring or mountain bike. > > > > > > 3. The tolerable limits also have to do with one's preferences for > owning > > > > fewer multipurpose or more single purpose bikes. > > > > > > Having disposed of that: > > > > > > For me, 170: gofast, certainly under 20 lb equipped. Mine is (ahem) > 17 > > > 3/4 > > > > lb exactly. Nice commuter under 25 lb equipped but not laden. Mine is > > > > probably under 23 lb with rack but no bag. But when you get to errand > > > > beaters and tourer/offroad bikes, who is to say? I'd love a 20 lb ss > > > 29er, > > > > but I'd rather have my multipurpose Fargo, which is porcine at 33 lb, > > > than a > > > > single use, lightweight ss off road bike if I had to choose just one. > My > > > > Motobecane is unweighed but, equipped and unladen, I'd guess it is at > > > least > > > > 28 lb despite the nicely light frame thanks to heavy wheels, > non-SON20R > > > > dynohub, luggage and so forth. > > > > > > I did some windy hills this afternoon, about 17 or 18 miles (no > computer! > > > So > > > > I can fudge!) on the gofast and let me tell you, climbing those > hills, > > > > especially with SW 21 G 33 winds, is far easier when your bike is 10 > lb > > > less > > > > (and of course the wheels are far, far lighter). > > > > > > OTOH, the porcine Motobecane and grossly obese Fargo are still fun to > > > ride > > > > -- funner than many a lighter bike I've ridden. I'd choose fun over > light > > > > any day. (Still, how can I drop 10 lb from the Fargo.....?) > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:54 PM, MichaelH <mhech...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > OK, now that we have dispensed with helmets, allow me to raise > another > > > > > controversial topic. > > > > > > > This is not like, when am I too heavy, which is easy.... right now. > > > > > > > I have 4 bikes, well 6 really, but we wont go into those details. > All > > > > > four of them are around 62 cm and get ridden regularly - a 1988 > > > > > classic stage racing frame, weighing around 22 lbs; a Rambouillet, > > > > > outfitted with White/ Open Pro wheels, a White dbl crank, Honjo > > > > > fenders, a Mark's Rack, and light tires also weighing about 22 > lbs.; > > > > > a 1984 Trek (Reynolds 531 standard gauge tubing) with Shimano 9 > speed > > > > > cranks and shifters, SKS Fenders, Passella 32 mm T Guards and > coming > > > > > in around 25 lbs; and An Ebisu All Purpose, with front and real > steel > > > > > racks, steel fenders, MA 40 Rims, triple DaVinci Cranks, and 38 mm > > > > > Avocet Cross tires that weighs in at a hefty 30 lbs. > > > > > > > I live in Vermont, which has lots of rolling hills and some > > > > > significant climbs. Do you think the 5 lbs alone, between the > Trek > > > > > and Ebisu is enough to effect the performance? What about the 3 lb > > > > > difference between the Rambouillet and the Trek? Or, are the > > > > > perceived differences imaginary? > > > > > > > michael > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > > > > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > > > > To post to this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com > > > . > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > Patrick Moore > > > > Albuquerque, NM > > > > For professional resumes, contact > > > > Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com- Hide > quoted > > > text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > > > -- > > Patrick Moore > > Albuquerque, NM > > For professional resumes, contact > > Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com- Hide quoted > text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
