I don't know, I prefer stiffer frames so for me they are better. On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 7:33:04 AM UTC-5, ted wrote:
> I think Jan asserts that stiffer is slower, which is objectively > measurable. > > On Aug 7, 5:02 am, justinaug...@gmail.com wrote: > > I think the key point here is that you (or me or Jan or Sheldon) are > making judgement calls about what 'better' means. 'Better' is not a > scientific measurement. It's an opinion. Stiffer is measurable. It's > objective. That doesn't mean it is 'better' or 'worse' for anyone but the > person choosing. I think that often we confuse descriptive, opinion based > adjectives with descriptive, objectively data derived ones. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/m_2luTI4UbEJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
