On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Deacon Patrick <lamontg...@mac.com> wrote:
> Based on the reviews I've read, the author appears to have incredibly poor > logic and reason. For vibrant discussion see: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/huaraches/n8Ap2wV-iNI > Those reviews are from people vested in the paleo diet, and what I read in your link has people attacking a point (e.g., "blue eyes") and then someone pointing out why Zuk is right (or probably right). Anyone who thinks the diet issue has been settled by the paleo recommendations is fooling themselves. There is plenty of research showing that source of calories don't matter. Even at RBW the issue is not settled. There are several Riv-workers of Asian heritage who rightfully point out that a rice-heavy diet is not a recipe for obesity. I'm not trying to fan a flame war -- if it works for you, great. But to think that there aren't flaws in the reasoning behind this (or any) diet is fantasy. happy trails jim m wc ca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en-US. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
