Nothing wrong with gears or using gear calculators to plan your set-up. 
 Versatility is a good thing.  Just like purpose-built is another good 
thing.  Not every bike needs a 26-inch gear, just like every bike doesn't 
need a 105-inch gear. (My buddy's Santana tandem has a 126-inch gear)
I rode 30 miles in cool light rain at the end of a monsoon yesterday, 
fording senderos that became temporary creeks, and compared to our normal 
summer heat, it was a joy.  Not every bike needs fenders, but glad I was on 
my fender bike yesterday.  

On Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:09:38 PM UTC-5, Philip Williamson wrote:
>
> I like a challenge; to paraphrase Sheldon Brown, "If you wanted it to be 
> easy, why are you riding a bike?"
> However, I just geared up a 
> bike<http://www.biketinker.com/2013/projects/four-clicks-on-a-7-speed-shifter/>
>  to 
> ride with workmates, and I like it. My first try with the bar-end shifter 
> left me with a gear range of 54" to 72" which, yes, is the same high and 
> low I have on my fixed gear bikes. I have in fact climbed Sweetwater 
> Springs in the 54" gear, and pushed it up in the 72". 
>
> I did fix the bar-end shifter, thanks to listmembers' advice, by winding 
> the ratchet back up. 
> Philip
> www.biketinker.com
>
>
> On Sunday, June 30, 2013 6:24:49 PM UTC-7, Patrick Moore wrote:
>>
>> This is interesting. My own take on the bike-to-rider "contest of 
>> mastery" is that I like to adapt myself to the bike's limitations and to 
>> the circumstances -- terrain, wind, gear, load, etc. I'd rather learn to 
>> grunt a 40 lb load up a mile-long hill than to create a gear system that 
>> will let me exert more or less equal energy at 18 mph on the flat, 10 mph 
>> on the hill, and 30 on the downhill. (I used to be that way, but no longer 
>> -- in fact, I was that way theoretically, devising ingenious gear systems, 
>> but found myself riding a very limited range of gears.)
>>
>> For me, one of the great joys of cycling is overcoming obstacles -- wind, 
>> hill, load -- with limited means. It's horses for courses. Of course, my 
>> favored rides are short (and, relatively, energetic) but, with that 
>> qualification, I hugely enjoy riding one gear across many different 
>> circumstances. Even with the two derailleur bikes I have (Fargo, mostly off 
>> road, Ram, on road) I "naturally" ride in just 2 or 3 gears across a very 
>> wide range of conditions, load, wind, hills.
>>
>> I daresay that, after 8 hours in the saddle, and facing a miles-long, 
>> steep hill against a wind with 40 lb of gear, I'd be grateful for that 20" 
>> low, too. But I did want to add this other, perhaps very idiosyncratic, 
>> perspective, to the many that make up the world of pleasurable cycling.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Anne Paulson <anne.p...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't want my bike to order me around. I don't want my bike to be
>>> whining to me that I can't ride some nice quiet road. I'm the boss of
>>> my bike, and if I say Sweetwater, we go up Sweetwater, so I need gears
>>> that do the job they are hired for.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Eric Platt <eperic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > And yet, in the latest issue of Dirt Rag (a mountain bike focused 
>>> magazine),
>>> > the mechanic column had a quote along the lines of "the only thing 
>>> dumber
>>> > than a triple on a mountain bike, is a triple on a road bike."  Seems 
>>> like a
>>> > lot of folks are thinking that way.
>>> >
>>> > Now, for non-loaded touring, on the hills I have ridden, a compact 
>>> with a
>>> > 32/42 (or 44) up front and a 12-36 rear might be fine.  Then again, 
>>> for a
>>> > long climb either out east or west, would probably want a 24 up front, 
>>> along
>>> > with the 36 in the back.
>>> > Eric Platt
>>> > St. Paul, MN
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Anne Paulson <anne.p...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> People who ride compact doubles chose those bikes. Sometimes just
>>> >> riding by them on a steep hill in your comfortable triple is enough to
>>> >> make them rethink whether their gearing is what they want. People
>>> >> sometimes buy the bike for the fitness they wish they had, instead of
>>> >> the fitness they actually have.
>>> >>
>>> >> I rode Sierra to the Sea with a friend. He is one of those
>>> >> technophiles who wants everything new, and he has some kind of
>>> >> whizbang titanium bike, with some kind of superlight wheels (one of
>>> >> whose hubs cracked during the ride, and of course there was no way to
>>> >> fix it, so he just continued on with what he said was considerable
>>> >> drag). He had what to me seemed to be absurdly high gears given the
>>> >> ride, although he did not do the steepest hills I did. I think his low
>>> >> was probably twice as high as my ridiculously low low. But after the
>>> >> ride, he emailed me about getting lower gears. Good choice.
>>> >>
>>> >> It would be great if we could get a Riv contingent on Sierra to the
>>> >> Sea. We could show another riding esthetic, opposed to the go-go-go
>>> >> esthetic that some of the fast riders have. Nothing wrong with going
>>> >> fast, or wanting to go fast, as your entire purpose of riding, if
>>> >> that's the way you feel. But it doesn't hurt to show people another
>>> >> way of thinking about riding.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, dougP <doug...@cox.net> wrote:
>>> >> > Thanks for the write-up.  I plan to mark my calendar for next year
>>> >> > (never
>>> >> > too early to plan).  That's a wonderful area for cycling.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Last year, a charity I'm involved in did a week long tour through 
>>> that
>>> >> > area,
>>> >> > and Sweetwater Springs was an optional route.  We also used some
>>> >> > interesting
>>> >> > hills in the Napa Valley.  The only grumbles we heard were from 
>>> folks
>>> >> > with
>>> >> > compact doubles and standard racing bike gearing who were unhappy 
>>> about
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > hills.  Since most of the event crew rides 30+ lb touring bikes, we
>>> >> > found it
>>> >> > difficult to be truly compassionate about "the problem".
>>> >> >
>>> >> > dougP
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Sunday, June 23, 2013 11:20:09 AM UTC-7, Anne Paulson wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Last week I was on the (very fine) Sierra to the Sea ride put on by
>>> >> >> Almaden Cycle Touring Club.  It was tons of fun. Rivendell was
>>> >> >> represented by me, and also JimD. The first night, I hopefully
>>> >> >> snuggled my British racing green Roadeo next to JimD's orange 
>>> custom,
>>> >> >> hoping that in the morning I'd see a little red Betty Foy, but 
>>> alas, I
>>> >> >> was disappointed. That was pretty much the only disappointment of 
>>> the
>>> >> >> entire trip, though. The food was super and plentiful, and somehow
>>> >> >> ACTC managed to route us across the entire state of California on
>>> >> >> fabulous roads.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Some of those roads were rough: Dogtown Road in the Sierra 
>>> foothills,
>>> >> >> some Delta roads and the fabulous Coleman Valley Road in Sonoma 
>>> County
>>> >> >> spring to mind. My Roadeo with Rolly Polys purred like a kitten. 
>>> The
>>> >> >> Jack Browns might have even been a better choice.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Overheard:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Rider #1: My neck gets so sore sometimes when I'm riding, I have to
>>> >> >> look down for a while instead of looking ahead.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Rider #2: Me too, even though I know it's not that safe.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Me: Have you tried raising your handlebars?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Rider #1: ?? You mean tilting them?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Me: No, just moving them up higher.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Rider #1: (puzzled) I don't think you can do that on my bike.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Jim Warren showed up to say hello and ask about the ride, on his 
>>> Hunqa
>>> >> >> with the Big Bens. The two riders with me were obviously appalled 
>>> at
>>> >> >> the the idea that someone might try the ride with Big Bens. ("But
>>> >> >> they're so heavy!") In fact, Big Bens would be great.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> In addition to the idea that bikes need to be shod with 23 mm or 
>>> 25 mm
>>> >> >> tires, a number of the Sierra to the Sea riders apparently 
>>> subscribed
>>> >> >> to the common belief that extra clothing, food and equipment weigh
>>> >> >> less if you carry them in a backpack or in jammed pockets, than if 
>>> you
>>> >> >> carry them on the bike. Saddlebags and front bags were not much in
>>> >> >> evidence.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> One day we rode from Calistoga to the Russian River. The optional
>>> >> >> route included Sweetwater Springs, one of those roads that is 
>>> terrific
>>> >> >> in almost every possible way: deserted, with oak grasslands, then a
>>> >> >> secluded little valley, then a (steep) climb up through redwoods. 
>>> The
>>> >> >> regular route was not too shabby either, but I chose the Sweetwater
>>> >> >> option. On the way up I passed a couple of other riders walking. I
>>> >> >> understand the appeal of compact doubles if compact doubles give 
>>> you
>>> >> >> low enough gears. And for a lot of people (who are stronger than 
>>> me or
>>> >> >> lighter than me or both) compact doubles do work. But riders who 
>>> are
>>> >> >> walking the steep hills, or riding up them with some 
>>> knee-destroying
>>> >> >> cadence in the 30s or 40s, need lower gears. It's sad to hear, "The
>>> >> >> guy in the bike shop told me..." when the guy in the bike shop
>>> >> >> obviously told the rider the wrong thing.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I highly recommend Sierra to the Sea. Try it for yourself next 
>>> year and
>>> >> >> see!
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> -- Anne Paulson
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> My hovercraft is full of eels
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> >> > Groups
>>> >> > "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>> send
>>> >> > an
>>> >> > email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> >> > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
>>> >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch
>>> .
>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> -- Anne Paulson
>>> >>
>>> >> My hovercraft is full of eels
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups
>>> >> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>> send an
>>> >> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> >> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
>>> >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
>>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups
>>> > "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an
>>> > email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- Anne Paulson
>>>
>>> My hovercraft is full of eels
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
>> patric...@resumespecialties.com
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmooreresumespec/
>>
>>
>> Albuquerque, NM
>>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to