Woah.  I had no idea that defensive values applied to support vehicles which 
is why I didn't give the armor thickness.  I was assuming that all support 
vehicles were one hit irregardless of armor thickness.

 The Spartan has 25 mm aluminum alloy armor, kinda like the M113 has.

 Hmm ... this opens possibilities.  Doesn't Isreal and Russia both have APCs 
built on tank chassis?  Heh.

Mike




________________________________
From: Frank Pittelli <frank.pitte...@gmail.com>
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:21:23 PM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: SV015 Designated


Clark Ward Jr wrote:
> Technically, only a 'Tank' gets the immunity to hits from the front...
> 
> But the defensive rating table doesn't specify which type of vehicle,
> it only counts armor thickness.  So, an FV103 presumably having
> between 1mm and 34mm of armor, gets 2 hits.

Correct on both counts.  The defensive rating of any vehicle, regardless 
of how it is used, is determined by armor thickness according to the 
table defined in the rules.  And, only a "Tank" (which requires the 
vehicle to have a gun) gets the Frontal Hit exemption.

So, for example, if a Sherman tank is configured as a mine-sweeper (ie. 
no gun), then it is deemed a "Support Vehicle" with an offensive rating 
of 0, a defensive rating of 4 and all frontal hits will count.

The only reason that SV015 was not given a defensive rating of "2" on 
the website was because Mike failed to provide me with the proper "data" 
when he asked for a designation.  When he tells me what the maximum 
frontal armor thickness is, I can update the rating accordingly.  The 
"paperwork" is just as important as the building :-)

    Frank P.



      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to