I don't have any problems with the 19.2.1.1.1 list, since RDA clearly identifies corporate bodies with these roles as creators. Just surprised to find that we'll be entering in 1XX some entities which RDA does not identify as creators, and thinking that people who don't have a lot of time to read RDA could get confused.
Best wishes, Bernadette ******************* Bernadette O'Reilly Catalogue Support Librarian 01865 2-77134 Bodleian Libraries, Osney One Building Osney Mead Oxford OX2 0EW. ******************* -----Original Message----- From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas Sent: 23 August 2012 16:52 To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fw: What Goes into the 1xx Field? > -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and > Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Bernadette > Mary O'Reilly > Sent: August 23, 2012 11:21 AM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Fw: What Goes into the 1xx Field? > > Dear colleagues, > > I come very late to this thread, because I've only just been catching > up with the list. > > One thing that surprised me is that 1XX fields have to hold some > elements which RDA defines not as creator but as "other person, > family, or corporate body associated with a work". For instance, if > cataloguing an official liturgy you would have to enter in 110 "the > authorised access point representing the church or denominational > body..." and in > 240 "the preferred title for the liturgical work..." [6.30.1.5.2] even > though the role of a church/denominational body which issues a liturgy > is not covered by the list in 19.2.1.1.1 of corporate bodies > considered to be creators. > > The clue is in 19.3 under the Core Element heading: > "Other person, family, or corporate body associated with a work is a > core element if the access point representing that person, family, or > corporate body is used to construct the authorized access point > representing the work." > This is the only explicit statement I have found in RDA that the name > used in a name-title AAP may be that not of a "creator" but of an > "other" (and I missed it on first reading). Unfortunately this means > that when training my colleagues I cannot tell them that the principal > or first-named RDA "creator" of a work should be entered as 1XX in a > MARC record without adding an awkward qualification. > There is another mention in 18.3 - Core Elements for relationships between p-cb-f and wemi. Include as a core element "Other person, family, or corporate body associated with a work (if the access point representing that person, family, or corporate body is used to construct the authorized access point representing the work)." So for corporate bodies, one has to look at the list in 19.2.1.1.1, as well as the specific instructions for authorized access points for specialized works in 6.27-6.31 to determine if the corporate body is a core element (which is the same as saying it's required as part of the authorized access point for the work, which follows up on the same basic decisions regarding main entry in AACR2). Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library
