On 21/03/2013 12:26, Bernhard Eversberg wrote:
<snip>
> Am 21.03.2013 12:01, schrieb Elizabeth O'Keefe:
>> Is part of the problem that  we use published versus unpublished as a
>> dividing line for textual material but not for other types of material?
>
> Well, apart from the difficulty of drawing it, the Lubetzkian question
> has to be asked: Is this dividing line necessary?
</snip>

For a long time, "publication" was linked to getting copyright, making
copies and distributing them. A published item had certain protections
that an unpublished item did not, in this way there was a distinction
between published literature and "grey" literature. Grey literature
are/were resources that are printed and distributed but do not normally
have copyright protection because it wasn't seen as worth the effort.
You could also have items copyrighted but never published.

Now with the latest copyright conventions, everything is automatically
copyrighted from the moment it is written down--even a few thoughts
jotted on the back of a napkin--and the distinction between published
and unpublished materials has become much less tangible. It would seem
that anything on the web is automatically "published". At one
organization I worked at, we concentrated on cataloging grey literature
because it was so difficult to get. The web has made that literature
some of the easiest to get today.

The dates on a catalog record do not, and should not, have any legal
standing whatsoever. The information there is only to help the users and
librarians find and identify resources. The use is strictly practical
and should be considered that way. Perhaps a more useful way of dealing
with the issue is the cataloger should enter dates connected to the
resource that will help people identify or find that resource. But
catalogers spending their time trying to figure out whether a date has
to do with real "publication" would not seem to help anyone find or
identify anything.

-- 
*James Weinheimer* weinheimer.ji...@gmail.com
*First Thus* http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/
*Cooperative Cataloging Rules*
http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/
*Cataloging Matters Podcasts*
http://blog.jweinheimer.net/p/cataloging-matters-podcasts.html

Reply via email to