> -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod > Sent: April-02-13 2:17 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] relationship designator and "in cooperation with" > > Alison Hitchens posted: > > >/ Giuseppe Barbaro, Franck Boccara (Eds) ; in cooperation with Giorgio > >Barb= arini > > >=3D700 1\$aBarbaro, Giuseppe,$eeditor of compilation. > >=3D700 1\$aBoccara, Franck$eeditor of compilation. > >=3D700 1\$aBarbarini, Giorgio. ???? > > How about Barbarini, Giorgia,$econtributor.? > > When one donesn't know what the contribution was, that's a nice catchall. > SLC would use $4ctb. >
The $4 relator term "ctb" is likely not the same as the broader element "contributor". Dublin Core appears to have the same problem: http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/loc.terms/relators/dc-contributor.html where for the broad relationship element "contributor" several refinements pulled from the MARC relator term list are offered. One is $4ctb for contributor -- a refinement of "contributor" in Dublin Core and applied in a narrower set of circumstances. Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library
