I agree that it's going to be a thorn for a while. Still, it's better than being stuck with RHEL5. :-S
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:58 AM +0200, "Markus Sitzmann" <markus.sitzm...@gmail.com> wrote: I get the feeling, RH/Centos 6 becomes the next XP kind of story - to many legacies that make the update impossible or very hard. Also docker, a great technology that could mitigate this problem, is very painful under RH/Centos 6. -----------Markus Sitzmann On 29 Sep 2016, at 07:31, Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Peter S. Shenkin <shen...@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks... so it sounds like the main effort (aside from what you delicately called "professional development" ;-) ) will be to introduce features that improve robustness or performance when writing new code and possibly when maintaining (fixing, extending) existing code. Yes, I think that's about right with the one refinement that we'll be using some automated tools to convert the existing code to use some of those new features. -greg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
