I think fingerprint based comparison will still not cope with equivalent 
structures – and I doubt that they’re guaranteed to be ‘collision’ free.

Cheers,
Steve.

From: Christos Kannas [mailto:chriskan...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 November 2016 17:32
To: Stephen O'hagan <soha...@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] comparing two or more tables of molecules

Hi Steve,

I think it would be better to use a similarity metric based on fingerprints.

Regards,

Christos

Christos Kannas

Researcher
Ph.D Student

On 28 November 2016 at 18:25, Stephen O'hagan 
<soha...@manchester.ac.uk<mailto:soha...@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
Has anyone come up with fool-proof way of matching structurally equivalent 
molecules?

Unique Smiles or InChI String comparisons don’t appear to work presumable 
because there are different but equivalent structures, e.g. explicit vs 
non-explicit H’s, Kekule vs Aromatic, isomeric forms vs non-isomeric form, 
tautomers etc.

I also expect that comparing InChI strings might need something more than just 
a simple string comparison, such as masking off stereo information when you 
don’t care about stereo isomers.

I assume there are suitable tools within RDKit that can do this?

N.B. I need to collate tables from several sources that have a mix of smiles / 
InChI / sdf molecular representations.

I usually use RDKit via Python and/or Knime.

Cheers,
Steve.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to