Joseph Nastasi wrote:
Great, but why would you expect that RS needs to take that into consideration? It's a shame that it's no longer an advantage to you but, RS will hardly fold over this. Whereas they might fold if the product becomes less stable...
I think what you are trying to say is not relevant to the discussion because people are not arguing that they are going to stop using RB, but the opposite in that they feel passionately about using RB and people really like the NUG and RS is poking a hot stick into our eye for bogus reasons. The NUG actually helps the quality of RB since people discuss bug reports and feature requests and bring some semblance of thought to the process. Without the NUG there will be less voting on bugs and feature requests because they won't be seen so in turn has less information to help them do their job. This flies in the face of what you are saying. People are upset with this decision because RS is basically killing off the NUG for their own comfort. They are not looking to solve the problem, but chose a solution that cost them the least effort. This is selfish on their part and just down right lazy and stupid. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> REAL Software has decided to consolidate this mailing list with the online Forums. On Monday, February 12, 2007, this mailing list will no longer be active. We encourage you to continue your REALbasic and REAL SQL Server discussions on the Forums. If you are not presently a member of the forum, please sign up today at <http://forums.realsoftware.com>.
