I agree. Especially with the bugs introduced with r2, the thought of having to live with them for 3 months just because RS is obsessed with their release cycle just makes me feel bad.
Right now I'm learning to use Qt4 with C++. Maybe RS should take a look at their release cycle, it seems to do a much better job. The name "Rapid Release Model" has nothing to do with this. Why can't they release a few bugfix release for RB2007 and simply name it r3? Where is the problem? -- Best regards, Bastian Bense _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
