Totally agree. there is no true one to one, design in one deploy native in all solution. RB is good, but its not greate.
For us, to make it feel as if its a native application in each platform, we have to open the project in either platform(windows, or mac) and tweak it so that it has the looks our apps need to have on a given platform. Producing in Windows and compiling for a mac is not enough for me. The look is not right. I have noticed the same on some of the apps some people here have built, where I can tell the app was not made in Windows but compiled from a Mac. It nothing major, but I would not ship an app like that, unless the UI is tight and nice. For some, its no issue, for me it is. Chris Little wrote: > on 5/2/07 3:17 PM, Bill Cavalieri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> ----- E. Lysander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This item ( http://theocacao.com/document.page/440 ) "The thing is Mac >>> users just don't want cross-platform apps." >>> >> Thats why I use RB, native on each platform. >> > > Yes and no. The controls look native and mostly behave correctly but by > default an RB app's UI is sized and laid out correctly for the platform it > was designed on. You have to do a fair amount of work to make it look right > every where. > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
