Yes- some sort of scheme whereby the same controls get used in the layout but dimensions, colours, positions and such can be "switched" between platforms, similar to how constants can be defined per platform. This should be done in a visual fashion, not through wads of constants.
Cross platform is the NR 1 selling point of RB. Everything should be done to maximise this strength. I guess once RB "coocoa" arrives things might improve apple wise too. On 2/5/07 20:49, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2-May-07, at 1:38 PM, Chris Little wrote: > >> on 5/2/07 3:17 PM, Bill Cavalieri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> >>> ----- E. Lysander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> This item ( http://theocacao.com/document.page/440 ) "The thing >>>> is Mac >>>> users just don't want cross-platform apps." >>> >>> Thats why I use RB, native on each platform. >> >> Yes and no. The controls look native and mostly behave correctly >> but by >> default an RB app's UI is sized and laid out correctly for the >> platform it >> was designed on. You have to do a fair amount of work to make it >> look right >> every where. > > Something like this would help > > <http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=ebpridoo> > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
