My point was simply that WE (RB users) can't necessarily just grab an old version of RB to compile our apps if the newer version breaks something or a required plugin isn't compatible with the later version.
Tim -- Tim Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] On May 13, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Norman Palardy wrote: > On 13-May-07, at 11:32 AM, Tim Jones wrote: >> Yes, but XCode 2.0 was released with the DTK long before public >> exposure was a problem and we were able to move our C code over to >> fat binary results immediately. In fact, we had our UB versions >> compiled and ready two days after receiving our DTK units. Hmmm, >> that was in Summer 2005, and we finally got RB fat binary support in >> late 2006. > > And a fat binary version of Word , Excel , PowerPoint , Adobe > Creative Suite , Quark ? > > REAL moved it as fast as they could given the legacy code they had to > move and create whatever let the compiler spit out UB code, etc > > I'd love to have had UB's the day the move to Intel was announced or > the day they first shipped but I do understand why they could not get > there that fast _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
