I think you are making excuses for RB. For Sure my C code isnt written to do that, simply because I wrote the simplest and fastest C code I could think of to do the same task as I want to achieve in RB. Why should I want to make my C code artificially slower to do a very common task? The whole point of all this is I want to use RB - not C.
Tell me exactly how to code this in RB alone to speed things up and I will be happier. I might take your suggestion up though just to clear up this issue and post the results here. On 16/5/07 15:44, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Change your C code to C++ code that calls a virtual method to get a > value out of the array, and another to stuff a new value in, and I bet > the performance will be similar to RB. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
