On 16-May-07, at 9:04 AM, Daniel Stenning wrote: > Actually - I've just remembered - even that isnt it. > > I did a rerun earlier where I simply commented out the code inside > the > nested loops. This would eliminate any issues due to virtual method > calls. > > Naturally the timings fell for both RB and C. But to my surprise > RB was > STILL around 9 times slower than C !.
You're sure the C loop didn't get optimized right out ? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
