On May 16, 2007, at 14:57 UTC, Daniel Stenning wrote:

> I think you are making excuses for RB.

No, I'm trying to help in *understanding* RB, so that we know what to
ask for.

> Tell me exactly how to code this in RB alone to speed things up and I
> will be happier.

I can't; your loop (with the pragmas) already looks as fast as it can
be to me (assuming you need to work with individual values, as you
said).  I think it would be up to RS to make it perform better.

But, on another note, after my last message I saw your message where
you commented out the guts of the inner loop, and it was *still* 10X
slower than C.  This surprises me, because in that case they really
should compile down to pretty much the same thing.  This may be worth
digging into more deeply, but leave the method calls out of it until we
understand what's going on with the loop itself.

Best,
- Joe

--
Joe Strout -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strout Custom Solutions


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to