Ok tundra 2.0 built with Jukkas deps, no problems. Fast to compile and alot faster startup than before on both server and client.
First played around with the new skyx and hydrax, looks sweet with the volumetric clouds: - http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3589544/tundra2.png - http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3589544/tundra2_2.png - http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3589544/tundra2_3.png After Toni does the code merge to rex repos we can start working on the branch. I think it would be a good time to revise our directory structure. Also separate the purely core SDK from the more application level stuff. This core + app = Tundra client/viewer package that you have been seeing with the before Tundra releases. Then we could provide the SDK to people who want to use it to their own applications. This is also intended for the companies developing rex, like Ludocraft. So they can just pick up the core without unneccesary clutter when they start a project and run with it. Directory structure that I would like to see (something like this, well have to think more on it). This would be the core repos structure: /src <-- has tundra core sdk sources /src-app <-- empty folder that you git clone tundra-app repo that has additional modules/ECs/scripts/scenes/assets for the Tundra application we provide. or you could checkout your companys own app code here. /bin <-- just the core sdk needed assets/scripts/things. the src-app build process would copy more things into here when needed /doc <-- the new dox generator static pages and dirs to generate html docs? /cmake <-- our cmake related things. Here i would like to see more FindSomeLib.cmake more than everything jammed into ConfigurePackages.cmake, but we will see. CMakeLists.txt <-- this pick up /src and /src-app automatically. If there is no code in src-app it simply does nothing there, but when checkout is there it has its own cmakelists.txt that pick ups from there. Best regards, Jonne Nauha Adminotech developer On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Peter Steinlechner <psteinlech...@gmail.com>wrote: > idk - but I think Bill just has some other expectations about Tundra - > maybe too much Second Life mindset without taking into account that Linden > Labs must have spent 30 - 50 man years before even going online in 2003 (and > it still runs quite shaky) > All I can say about the realXtend dev team is that they do an amazing job > and deserve my full respect. > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:58 PM, limes <lime...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Bill wrote: >> > Ok I've started the issue que for Tundra 2.0 >> > https://github.com/LudoCraft/Tundra/issues . Here are my issues with >> 2.0 >> > > I may not be a super developer but I've been around for a while and I >> have >> > > yet to get a has version to run without show stoppers. Can we just >> take some >> >> > > time too stabilize one version? >> >> > >> You have 1.0 working? Could someone please pass me the link to a >> WORKING! >> > >> version? >> >> > >>>> I'm sorry if I seem a little upset it's just that I've been >> following >> > >>>> the realxtend for I don't know how long and have yet to get a >> > >>>> functional platform working at all! >> >> > >>>> > > And I'm just a little confused.. This is Tundra 2.0 Preview? I >> > >>>> haven't >> > >>>> > > been able to get version One to work yet? Has anyone been able >> to >> > >>>> get >> > >>>> > > the first version to work because I'm feeling like a true idiot >> > >>>> here. >> >> Ive seen alot, but this is perhaps the retardest reply to an open >> source development. What do you expect? By subscribing to a mailing >> list youd have a birthright to make demands on what people other >> people build on their free time? you are not feeling like an idiot, >> you're also acting like one. They say it's called a preview, and not >> stable. Do you think it means something? It's open source, get the >> code and start stabilizing one version. I'm sure they want your fixes, >> can you do it? >> >> I installed it and cannot also drag and drop, but it is simple because >> you can't write to program files unless you run as administrator and >> as guru you should know that. Build a scene to your documents dir and >> it's all great. I also see the erors and warnings but they probably >> know about that one as well. Everything works ok even with them so >> they probably dont mean anything. >> >> Peace >> >> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/realxtend >> http://www.realxtend.org >> > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/realxtend > http://www.realxtend.org > -- http://groups.google.com/group/realxtend http://www.realxtend.org
