Hi Romano, it looks that my testing wasn't thorough enough. Sorry for misinforming. You should send it to feedback.
<<Romano>> ... It seems that the function is referenced two times through the variable name: the first to collect the argument number, the second to collect the body code. --- Ciao Romano <</Romano>> Yes, you are right! The only problem is, that this isn't the proper way how to do it (IMO!). The variable should be examined just once to get the function. Any subsequent usage of the variable for the same purpose is an unnecessary hazard. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
