Thanks for the thoughtful comments, "theham". I'll be dealing with a lot of what you say later on, but - in the meantime:
"all software is frustrating and flawed" - I think this is either not the case, or an awful indictment of our craft if it is. I personally make regular use of software that is neither flawed nor frustrating; as I alluded to earlier, maybe that should be rephrased as "all complex software is frustrating and flawed". I take the point, of course, that RedDot is not the only culprit. "If you can please update your blog post" - you beat me to it - thanks :) "Why not try and get a positive outcome from your currently negative experience?" - of course, that would be ideal. I guess I'm feeling pessimistic at the moment - I cannot see how I could possibly get a positive outcome from this software, given the flaws that, IMO, are pretty fundamental. So far, I've just dealt with the text editor creating invalid markup. As someone who has, over the last couple of years, really embraced web standards and clean, semantic markup, this DOES feel like a MASSIVE deal. However, there are other topics I'll be discussing which, I believe, will be more significant to some of you (gripe #2 - just posted - probably doesn't fall under this category, unfortunately). I'm talking core aspects of the RedDot CMS model which I consider flawed. I would love it if the RedDot engineers took some notice of these comments. I would also love it if an alternative CMS (preferably open source) could be suggested, or developed if there really is a gap in the market. On Nov 18, 11:19 am, theHam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > I understand your pain and frustration. I'm a 3 y.o reddoter with a > love/hate relationship with the wonderful world of reddot. I try to > make sure that my clients never have to experience the hate and i deep > down love the challenge. One thing i have noticed is that the biggest > gripes i have with the product have been resolved progressively > through the years. > > 1. Complex workaround asp driven navigation has been replaced by (imo) > a much flexible approach with navman > 2. user syncronisation has been significantly improved with the user > sync templates > 3. page definitions which has simplified and sped up the building out > of content > > A soon to be resolved issue on my gripe list will be the text editor > which is to be replaced by the telerik asp.net/ajax driven text editor > (i heard this month but could be wrong). Though we also have had > success with the ephox text editor and will be sad to see it go. > > As a few people mentioned all software is frustrating and flawed.. a > good example of this is that reddot will do things significantly > better than other product and significantly worse than others. If > reddot themselves don't move fast enough to bridge the gap that is > where people on this group and consultants can assist. > > A couple of things i think a lot of people on this group would > appreciate if you could do: > > 1. If you can please update your blog post with a link to this > discussion. That way at least people who find blog post via google can > come to this post to read an open discussion and maybe even find some > solutions to the issues that you have experienced whilst working on > reddot. > > 2. Why not try and get a positive outcome from your currently negative > experience? it sounds like your implementation partner is not > communicating or assisting as best as they can to help workaround > these issues. How about changing the blog to a weekly/fortnightly > reddot gripe challenge? Post your issues to your blog (if that is the > format you prefer) and cross reference it to the group. That way we > call all attempt to outdo each other in trying to find the most > efficient and/or creative solution possible. I think we'll all learn a > thing or two as we all try and outdo each other! Through that process > i hope you will get the assistance you require. > > Best of luck with your reddot or all other cms experiences in the > future. > > - Morgan > > On Nov 18, 7:11 pm, Frederic Hemberger > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the last RedDot Usergroup meeting in Frankfurt (Germany), Mr. > > Trageser (Head of RedDot support Germany) paid us a visit to talk > > about the support process. RedDot is aware of the problems with their > > knowlede bases. I say "bases" as he told us that some RedDot > > departments in different countries set up their own knowledge base, > > which is a problem for their own software consultants as well. > > According to him, RedDot is already working to bring together all > > pieces into a single source but he gave no estimations when this > > process will be finished. I really hope to see it online when the new > > release comes out in may. > > > On the other hand, the RedDot Usergroup (http://www.reddotusergroup.org) > > wants to collect hints and solutions in their > > own wiki. Unfortunately, everyone wants to have benefit for their own > > business, but most customers/partners are not willing to share or even > > talk at all. People are more open than a few years ago but we're far > > away from a flow of information like in an open source community, for > > example. > > > On 18 Nov., 07:48, Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I wish that the RedDot Community site > > > had a better knowledge base. They should have someone go through their > > > support tickets and put some KB items together. I bet there are some > > > nice solutions in there to all sorts of issues that perhaps not everyone > > > runs into... but would be nice nonetheless. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to RedDot-CMS-Users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RedDot-CMS-Users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
