On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 18:07:14 -0500, Adoram Rogel wrote:
>Scott Drake wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 14:40:01 -0500, Mike Wangsmo wrote:
>>
>> >>So, the question is: Can I install RH 5.0 without glibc ?
>> >>I just want libc-5.
>> >>Can I remove glibc now and have just libc-5 ?
>> >
>> >Nope. Every bin on a RH5.0 system (minus a very small number) is linked
>> >against glibc. If you want a libc5 system, then you should just use RH 4.2
>> >and not even think about 5.0
>>
>> So what you are saying Mike is that anyone who purchased RH 5.0 and
needs
>> to compile libc5 programs WASTED their Hard Earned Money on it since
RH
>> 5.0 will not compile libc5 programs?
>>
>
>Well, the truth is that I do feel that I wasted the $50, and I am
>disappointed.
>I should have bought the 4.2 distribution, if at all (I have 4.1).
I too am disappointed that after 4 months this problem still hasn't been
addressed, so much for Quality Control. But just like Mirco$oft, they have our
money now so screw us :(
>What are the differences between 4.1 and 4.2 ?
I really don't know, I started with 4.2 and now have a BAD taste in my mouth
over 5.0 and considering changing to someone else's build entirely now :(
Regards,
Scott Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
