Just out of curiosity, how many filesystems do you have mounted?
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 12:20, Ted Gervais wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 January 2003 03:00 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ted Gervais wrote:
> > > John..
> > >
> > > Thanks for your note. And you were right!! It sure does work once you
> > > have the module installed.
> > >
> > > But I have another question. I have two partitions that I would like to
> > > mount.
> > >
> > > /dev/hda1 /dos_c ntfs defaults 1
> > > 1 /dev/hda5 /dos_d ntfs defaults
> > > 1 1
> > >
> > > The first one mounts just fine, but not the second one. Here is what I
> > > see when I try and mount the second one manually:
> > >
> > > # mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /dos_c
> > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1,
> > > or too many mounted file systems
> > >
> > > So something is wrong there. We know that /dev/hda5 mounted just fine
> > > but not hda1. And if I reverse things and mount /hda1 first than
> > > /dev/hda5 won't mount.
> > >
> > > Funny thing - if I type " mount /dev/hda1 /dos_c " it will mount just
> > > fine??
> > >
> > > I wonder why? This time I just didn't enter the " -t ntfs", and it
> > > worked??
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on this one fellows??
> >
> > Maybe your C drive is FAT instead of NTFS?
>
>
> Nope. Drive C has to be NTFS if I can mount either partition using NTFS.
> Its just that I can't mount BOTH of them using the NTFS statement, in my
> /etc/fstab file. But I can mount one of them and than the other only
> manually when I DON'T use 'NTFS ("mount /dev/hda1 /dos_d")..
>
>
>
> --
> T.L.Gervais
> Coldbrook, NS
> Canada.
--
--
Slainte,
Richard S. Crawford
AIM: Buffalo2K / Y!: rscrawford / ICQ: 11640404
http://www.mossroot.com http://www.stonegoose.com
"It is only with our heart that we can see clearly. What is essential
is
invisible to the eye." --Antoine de Saint Exupery
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
