You said that you were trying to mount two separate NTFS partitions, and
that you could mount either one or the other but not both.

I'm not aware of any restrictions on the number of NTFS file systems
that you can mount at once, but I know that you're allowed to mount up
to four primary partitions at once before you have to start using
logical partitions inside an extended partition (something I found out
the long, hard way).

So, I can't help but wonder if you're already mounting three primary
partitions (which seems to make sense -- root, swap, and boot), and then
trying to mount yet another two partitions, both of which happen to be
NTFS.  In which case, the error message "...too many mounted file
systems" would certainly apply.

It's just a guess.  But it would be instructive to see the entire
contents of your /etc/fstab.


On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 13:22, Ted Gervais wrote:
> At 12:36 PM 1/21/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >Just out of curiosity, how many filesystems do you have mounted?
> 
> 
> Just trying to mount two ntfs file systems.  Would that be two too many??
> 
> 
> 
> >On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 12:20, Ted Gervais wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 21 January 2003 03:00 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ted Gervais wrote:
> > > > > John..
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your note.  And you were right!!  It sure does work once you
> > > > > have the module installed.
> > > > >
> > > > > But I have another question.   I have two partitions that I would 
> > like to
> > > > > mount.
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > /dev/hda1              /dos_c                  ntfs    defaults        1
> > > > > 1 
> > /dev/hda5               /dos_d                  ntfs    defaults
> > > > > 1 1
> > > > >
> > > > > The first one mounts just fine, but not the second one.  Here is what I
> > > > > see when I try and mount the second one manually:
> > > > >
> > > > > # mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /dos_c
> > > > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda1,
> > > > >        or too many mounted file systems
> > > > >
> > > > > So something is wrong there.  We know that /dev/hda5 mounted just fine
> > > > > but not hda1.  And if I reverse things and mount /hda1 first than
> > > > > /dev/hda5 won't mount.
> > > > >
> > > > > Funny thing - if I type  " mount /dev/hda1 /dos_c "   it will mount 
> > just
> > > > > fine??
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder why?  This time I just didn't enter the  " -t ntfs",  and it
> > > > > worked??
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts on this one fellows??
> > > >
> > > > Maybe your C drive is FAT instead of NTFS?
> > >
> > >
> > > Nope.  Drive C has to be NTFS if I can mount either partition using NTFS.
> > > Its just that I can't mount BOTH of them using the NTFS statement, in my
> > > /etc/fstab file.  But I can mount one of them and than the other only
> > > manually when I DON'T use 'NTFS ("mount /dev/hda1 /dos_d")..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > T.L.Gervais
> > > Coldbrook, NS
> > > Canada.
> >--
> >--
> >Slainte,
> >Richard S. Crawford
> >AIM: Buffalo2K / Y!: rscrawford / ICQ: 11640404
> >http://www.mossroot.com http://www.stonegoose.com
> >"It is only with our heart that we can see clearly.  What is essential
> >is
> >invisible to the eye."  --Antoine de Saint Exupery
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >redhat-list mailing list
> >unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-- 
--
Slainte,
Richard S. Crawford
AIM: Buffalo2K / Y!: rscrawford / ICQ: 11640404
http://www.mossroot.com http://www.stonegoose.com
"It is only with our heart that we can see clearly.  What is essential
is
invisible to the eye."  --Antoine de Saint Exupery



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to