On 26 Feb 2003 at 11:28, nate wrote: > Juan Nin said: > > > but I've heared that the new MySQL 4.x branch changes this a bit, > > and that from MySQL 4.1 there are nested queries support, etc > > I most certainly would reccomend AGAINST using mysql 4.x unless your > app has a long development time to give mysql 4.x time to stabilize(I > would not use it for probably at least a year). It still isn't "final" > according to mysql.com. And even after it is I would not deploy it > immediately. Though I am very cautious as to what I deploy on my > network, e.g. I only started re-evaluating the 2.4.x kernel for > deployment 3 months ago. > > The type app you describe seems like a common app for mysql.
Well yes and know to the use / not use MySQL-question. I wouldn't rate the university-use "mission critical". It runs good, that's what I hear from many people. And it's stablizing more and more. Got a bugfix-newsletter yesterday which only included some "minor" tweaks but no real holes. Why not give it a try in this surrounding? I believe its a good way to help evaluation of MySQL 4.x in a non- mission-critical-environement and I would vote for that solution. That's only my personal oppion for sure. Stefan -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
